A woman has testified that the man nominated for a vacant post on the US Supreme Court by Donald Trump carried out a sexual assault 36 years ago that “drastically” affected her life.

Christine Blasey Ford told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Brett Kavanaugh’s attack on her had left her “afraid and ashamed”.

Mr Kavanaugh has denied allegations by Dr Ford, along with those of a number of other women.

He is also due to testify.

The nine-member Supreme Court plays a vital role in US political life, as it has the final say on US law.

This includes highly contentious social issues, such as abortion, and challenges to government policy.

President Trump has called the hearing an “important day in the history of our country”.

You can watch the hearing via the live stream at the top of this page.

What did Christine Blasey Ford say?

No-one had heard from 51-year-old Dr Ford publicly previously since the allegations arose.

After addresses by the leading Republican and Democrat members, Dr Ford delivered her opening statement, at times close to tears.

In her prepared testimony, Dr Ford said: “I am here today not because I want to be. I am terrified. I am here because I believe it is my civic duty to tell you what happened to me while Brett Kavanaugh and I were in high school.”

She alleged Mr Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge had locked her in a bedroom during a small gathering at a house in a Washington DC suburb in the summer of 1982.

She said Mr Kavanaugh had tried to remove her clothing, pinned her to a bed and groped her, when she was 15 and he was 17. Both men were “drunkenly laughing”, she said.

She added: “Brett’s assault on me drastically altered my life. For a very long time, I was too afraid and ashamed to tell anyone the details.”

Under questioning by a Democratic senator, she said her most vivid memory was “the laughter between the two and their having fun at my expense… they were laughing with each other – two friends having a really good time with one another”.

In an answer to another Democratic senator’s question about claims of mistaken identity, Dr Ford said she was “100%” certain it was Mr Kavanaugh who had assaulted her.

The 21 senators on the committee were given five minutes each to ask her questions.

The 10 Democrats are posing questions themselves, many paying tribute to Dr Ford’s bravery in coming forward – and supporting her call for an FBI investigation into her allegations.

The 11 Republicans, all men, have deferred most of their questions to a female lawyer, Phoenix prosecutor Rachel Mitchell.

Dr Ford will reportedly leave the room before Mr Kavanaugh enters. Prof Ford had earlier asked not to be in the same room as the judge.

Mr Kavanaugh, 53, will deliver his statement and the same round of questioning will follow.

Do we know what Brett Kavanaughwill say?

In his written testimony, Mr Kavanaugh denies Dr Ford’s allegation “immediately, unequivocally, and categorically”, along with all other accusations against him.

The written testimony suggests Mr Kavanaugh will not try to portray himself as a saint.

He will say: “I was not perfect in those days, just as I am not perfect today. I drank beer with my friends, usually on weekends. Sometimes I had too many.”

But he will also say that what he has been accused of is “far more serious than juvenile misbehaviour”.

Are there other allegations against Mr Kavanaugh?

Yes, and new ones appeared as the hearing loomed. At present they are:

• Deborah Ramirez. The former Yale University classmate has said that Mr Kavanaugh once exposed himself to her at a dormitory party in the 1980s. She alleges the incident occurred during a drinking game and remembers Mr Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his trousers
• Julie Swetnick. A Washington DC resident. In a sworn affidavit she alleges Mr Kavanaugh was involved in the drugging and sexual assault of girls at house parties in the 1980s. She says she was the victim of a gang rape in 1982 at a party attended by the judge
• Anonymous. A woman sent a letter to a Colorado senator alleging her daughter had witnessed Mr Kavanaugh pushing a woman he was dating “very aggressively and sexually” against a wall in 1998

Mr Kavanaugh denies these allegations.

In his written testimony he says: “Over the past few days, other false and uncorroborated accusations have been aired. There has been a frenzy to come up with something – anything, no matter how far-fetched or odious – that will block a vote on my nomination.

“These are last-minute smears, pure and simple.”

What is Donald Trump’s stance?

He has portrayed the events in political terms, accusing the Democrats of trying to block the nomination.

Mr Trump has repeatedly defended the judge’s character, saying he is “one of the highest quality people” he has ever met.

But the president on Wednesday did say he could withdraw the nomination if accusations against the judge were proven.

He said: “I can always be convinced. If I thought he was guilty of something like this, yes, sure. It’s possible I’ll hear that, and I’ll say, ‘hey, I’m changing my mind’. I want to watch.”

Why does this all matter and what happens next?

The Senate Judiciary Committee must vote on Mr Kavanaugh’s confirmation before it goes to the full Senate for a vote there.

The committee is scheduled to vote on Friday but its chairman, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, has left open the possibility of a further delay.

All 10 Democratic senators on the committee have called on President Trump to “immediately withdraw” Mr Kavanaugh’s nomination.

Republicans want their nominee in place before mid-term elections next month, when they could lose their 51-49 control of the Senate.

Any confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh could also affect female voters in November. The confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991, despite allegations of sexual harassment, fuelled the rise of a new generation of female politicians in elections the following year. .

Supreme Court judges are nominated by the president and hold the position for life.

Mr Kavanaugh’s presence on the court could give it a more conservative character for decades.